In the recent study, Ganna and his colleagues used a method known as a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to look at the genomes of hundreds of thousands of people for single-letter DNA changes called SNPs. This hampered scientists’ ability to detect many variants associated with sexual orientation. Some studies suggested that a specific part of the X chromosome called the Xq28 region was associated with the sexual orientation of people who were biologically male - although subsequent research cast doubt on those results.īut these studies all had very small sample sizes and most focused on men, says Mills. Research from the 1990s 2 showed that identical twins are more likely to share a sexual orientation than are fraternal twins or adopted siblings. Scientists have long thought that someone’s genes partly influenced their sexual orientation. As a result, the work doesn’t include sexual and gender minorities (the LGBTQ community) such as transgender people and intersex people. The study authors also point out that they followed convention for genetic analyses by dropping from their study people whose biological sex and self-identified gender did not match. UK Biobank participants were between 40 and 70 years old when their data were collected, and the median age for people in 23andMe’s database is 51. The people who contribute their genetic and health information to those databases are predominantly of European ancestry and are on the older side.
The lion’s share of the genomes comes from the UK Biobank research programme and the consumer-genetics company 23andMe, based in Mountain View, California. “This is a solid study,” says Melinda Mills, a sociologist at the University of Oxford, UK, who studies the genetic basis of reproductive behaviours.īut she cautions that the results may not be representative of the overall population - a limitation that the study authors acknowledge. Ganna and his colleagues also used the analysis to estimate that up to 25% of sexual behaviour can be explained by genetics, with the rest influenced by environmental and cultural factors - a figure similar to the findings of smaller studies. “There is no ‘gay gene’,” says lead study author Andrea Ganna, a geneticist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The findings, which are published on 29 August in Science and based on the genomes of nearly 500,000 people, shore up the results of earlier, smaller studies and confirm the suspicions of many scientists: while sexual preferences have a genetic component, no single gene has a large effect on sexual behaviours. The largest study 1 to date on the genetic basis of sexuality has revealed five spots on the human genome that are linked to same-sex sexual behaviour - but none of the markers are reliable enough to predict someone’s sexuality. Genetic variants associated with same-sex sexual behaviour can’t be used to predict someone’s sexual orientation.